Judge Thomas Marcelain considers Harry Blausey's request for early release from prison, Duke Frost Objects... Get A Clue!, Robert Paisola Reports

Judge Thomas Marcelain considers Harry Blausey's request for early release from prison, Prosecutors Duke and Ken Oswalt  Object... Get A Clue!, Robert Paisola Reports

- WARNING TO OHIO ATTORNEY MARK  A.  SERROTT- YOU STOLE MONEY FROM BLAUSEY- WE ARE GOING TO GO AFTER YOU- RETURN THE $10,000 to THIS MANS FAMILY NOW-  WE HAVE THE RECORDINGS WITH YOUR OWN VOICE. SEE YOU ON CNN...

NEWARK OHIO -- A Newark man convicted of running a mortgage-fraud scheme wants a judge to release him from prison after serving less than half of his four-and-a-half-year sentence.

Harry Blausey, 69, claimed he would negotiate with victims' mortgage companies to avoid defaulting on their home debts. He then rented out the properties -- sometimes to the homeowner -- but did not successfully arrange short sales. He was convicted of 26 felony counts after a weeklong trial.

Licking County Common Pleas Court Judge Thomas Marcelain denied a request Blausey made shortly after his conviction to be placed in a state program that would have allowed him early release. Marcelain denied another request for judicial release in February.

In his most recent request, Blausey's attorney, Daniel Arnold, wrote that prison had a profound impact on his client and impressed on him the need to fully comply with the law, according to the motion filed Dec. 3. All but one of the civil lawsuits filed against Blausey have been settled.

Licking County Assistant Prosecutor asked Marcelain to deny Blausey's request, writing that releasing him would demean the seriousness of the crimes and would not adequately punish him, according to court records.

Robert Paisola Responds:

Judge Thomas Marcelain,

We know that you will do the right thing.  You are a great man and this data is essential, as we know that Duke Frost nor Ken Oswalt will take time to get this to you!

It is required that "The Court shall impose a sentence that is sufficient, but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in paragraph two." Paragraph two provides these factors "A, to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; B: To afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct C: To protect the public from further crimes of the Defendant; an D; to provide the defendant with the needed educational training , medical care or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner"

Put another way, it has been mandated that a sentencing court must impose a sentence that is sufficient but no greater than necessary to comply with the sentencing guidelines in this case. This statute clearly recognized a defendants liberty because it is a clear violation of the statute to impose a sentence that is harsher than necessary than to comply with the law. It also recognizes the importance of public safety by requiring that the sentence be sufficient to accomplish the purposes of punishment, deterrence and protection of the public.

As you are aware Blausey is no longer going to practice real estate, Blausey is no longer going to reside in Licking County Ohio, Blausey has been severely beaten in prison,  Blausey has proven that he has learned his lesson, even though there are hundreds of hours of tapes that outline correctional staff "Targeting"  This has not been fully published, as this is the subject of a Federal Case.  Blausey has paid back the victims and we have the final victim on tape stating that "Blausey did nothing wrong" "but I want money"  Blausey is now a victim of a serious sentence disparity that only you can rectify. Please do the right thing.  Branstool set the guideline, now it is time for Blausey to be given the chance to start anew.

The Supreme Court has also clearly stated that there must no be a disparity in the sentencing process, or the sentencing review process as we are faced with in the Blausey case.

The Finding of Judge Branstool that Defendant Joe McClain had completed a "sentence that is sufficient but no greater than necessary to comply with the sentencing guidelines in this case. This statute recognized a defendants right to liberty because it is a clear violation of the statute to impose a sentence necessary than to comply with the law. The McClain ruling sets the bar for the BLAUSEY Case, as Blausey Has not only made restitution to said victims, but has spent more time in a custodial setting than McCLAIN, causing a very clear sentencing disparity.  Have you EVER heard Duke Frost or Licking County Ohio Prosecutor Ken Oswalt recommend release?

Sir, I know this man. I know this family, and I know that you are just.

We would ask this honorable Court to Free Harry Blausey and to look at the nexus between the McClain Case and The Blausey Case. We would ask that this Honorable Court Do the right thing and give Blausey his life back, as the sentence as it stands now is nothing but a sentence to die.

Respectfully

Robert Paisola
CEO
The Robert Paisola Innocence Project

- WARNING TO OHIO ATTORNEY MARK  A.  SERROTT- YOU STOLE MONEY FROM BLAUSEY- WE ARE GOING TO GO AFTER YOU- RETURN THE $10,000 to THIS MANS FAMILY NOW-  WE HAVE THE RECORDINGS WITH YOUR OWN VOICE. SEE YOU ON CNN...

Gary Mohr named Ohio prisons chief

Thank You Mr. Mohr for looking into this fraud!

CHILLICOTHE -- A Chillicothe man with decades of experience in the public and private sector has been named director of Ohio's prisons.

Gov.-elect John Kasich announced Gary C. Mohr will head the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Mohr has an extensive career -- 36 years -- in corrections, most recently in a management role for a Tennessee company that was the first to provide privatization options for detention and corrections services.

Mohr will take over for current director Ernie Moore, of Sabina, who was appointed to the position by Gov. Ted Strickland in January 2010. Although from Sabina, Moore had once worked at Chillicothe Correctional Institution and took over for retiring director Terry Collins, of Chillicothe, who had been director since 2006.

Mohr's career in corrections began as a teacher at Marion Correctional Institution in 1974. He then was a liaison officer, classification supervisor and director of staff development and training and assistant chief of personnel until becoming the assistant warden at Chillicothe Correctional Institution in 1984 and later the warden from 1997 to 2000. In between his stints at CCI, Mohr was warden at Ross Correctional Institution from 1986 to 1991, deputy director of the ODRC from 1991 to 1992 and deputy director and superintendent for the Ohio Department of Youth Services from 2002 to 2005.

Mohr also has experience working with the governor's office from the early 1990s when he was director of the governor's Office of Criminal Justice. While director, Mohr chaired the task force on gun violence, chaired the investigation into the Lucasville riot, and initiated funding for several day reporting centers as alternative sentencing options.

In recent years, Mohr was the managing director at Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and a CEO of his own consulting business, Mohr Correctional Insight. CCA was founded in 1983 and was the first private sector provider of detention and corrections services to federal, state and local governments, according to its Web site.

Former ODRC director Richard Seiter, who served under Gov. Dick Celeste from 1983 to 1988, is CCA's current executive vice president and chief corrections officer, and one CCA board member, Donna Alvarado, currently sits on the Ohio Board of Regents and is vice chair of the governor's Workforce Policy Board.

Sign the Free Harry Blausey Real Estate Petition for the Governor of The State of Ohio

Please fill out the official form to show your support for Ohio Real Estate Investor Harry Blausey

The Talk On The Street: The Blausey Case- Keep Sending in your Comments on the Harry Blausey Newark, Ohio Real Estate Case

Who in the world would have ever thought that there would be this kind of support for a 67 year old Real Estate Investor from Newark, Ohio named Harry Blausey?

Our offices around the country have been flooded with calls, letters of support and comments. Many of you have volunteered your time to assist in this matter and many Attorneys have contacted our offices to help out. Some of the biggest names in the Real Estate Industry have offered to testify as to the validity of how the deals were done. The consensus is that theses are all CIVIL MATTERS and many attorneys have stated again and again that Harry Blausey "will make millions" in a Federal Lawsuit, should he decide to go down that route.

We want to be fair to all of the respondents, but the the sheer volume of calls and mail can not be addressed quickly enough.

If you are a member of the media, and you have called to do an interview, please do not give up, we will assist you. Simply send me an email to robert@robertpaisola.com and Include the words BLAUSEY MEDIA REQUEST in the subject line.

Because of the National and International scope of this case, we only have time to provide National and International Interviews. Please pull the audio and video feeds from your National Network Feeds. All of the interviews that we do are syndicated.

To the reporters in OHIO, we will work with you. Please just continue to send your requests in writing.

We are receiving thousands of emails from around the world on the Harry Blausey Case.

Everyone is welcome to participate in this discussion.

Last Night we reported that Blausey was assaulted at the Hocking County Correctional Facility in Nelsonville, Ohio. The phones have not stopped ringing. If you truly want to be heard on this matter, contact Warden Ed Banks at (740) 753-1917 Immediately.

We would ask that you DO NOT CALL THE LICKING COUNTY OHIO COURT OR THE COURT JUDGE. WE HAVE DEVELOPED A WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR OFFICES AND THEY HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY COOPERATIVE. I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THAT THE TRIAL JUDGE IS A VERY FAIR MAN. PLEASE HONOR THIS REQUEST.

Please be sure that you put the words HARRY BLAUSEY in the subject line. Our editors will be posting some of the replies that we receive. This is obviously quickly becoming a worldwide event my friends with BILLIONS OF DOLLARS of Real Estate Investor's Money at Stake.

Please send all comments to investigations@mycollector.com

Robert Paisola
CEO
The Robert Paisola Foundation
The Innocence Project
www.RobertPaisola.com
www.MyCollector.com

Here we go....
_______________________________________________________________

"Ohio seems to be the most ignorant when it comes to money.

First, we are top 10 in the sub-prime mess, second, they kill any opportunity to try to get the real estate market back on track.

I bet there is gonna be laws created against Sub-2's.

At the very least, this makes everyone doing sub-2's, suspicious.

What do you think about this mess?"



http://www.columbusdispatch.com/live...O.html?sid=101

http://www.centralohio.com/apps/pbcs...805040303/1002


http://www.centralohio.com/apps/pbcs...plate=printart

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/ne...-ohio-5536.pdf

http://www.doddforohio.com/index.php...ews&news_id=61

http://homeequitytheft-cases-article...harges-in.html
______________________________________________________________________

"Is it possible he got in over his head? Miscalculated the deal and decided to make what he could and let it get foreclosed (unethical, but not illegal).

People agree in writing to pay credit cards and loans and don't do it. You want their intent to be judged and charge them with fraud?"

________________________________________________________________________________

"NOT the same comparison. Selling drugs is illegal, REI is NOT.

This guy had auction properties he was buying. He had $50,000 of his own money lost because he can't deal in a LEGAL operation of real estate investing. Who is gonna recover the potential loss income if he is proven innocent?

Drug activity=illegal Buying auction properties and other REI=legal"
_________________________________________________________________________
"You are absolutely right, he is a complete victim of a justice system gone awry"
__________________________________________________________________________________
"Weak debate tactic #234 : Stretch the truth of what your opponent says to make him look obviously wrong.

And to think we waste all that money on a justice system when we have people like you who can figure it all out without all those confusing facts to sift through. You are amazing.

PASS THE TYLENOL!"
_________________________________________________________________________________

"OH has has a problem with employment and the economy for a while. Some cities saw their population peak 20 or more years ago. The state is in long term decline compared to CA and FL. The rust belt is a label that fits.

There has been a lot of fraud and shady deals in OH and it did not start with the sub-prime crisis. Some people want the situation fixed or otherwise corrected. That can lead to bad ideas being put forward. In some cases banning some of the more creative techniques will hurt investors but it still might be better than having newbie investors acting illegally or incompetently.

Rarely do laws focus on specifics that can apply equally well in all situations.

OH leads in many ways. Foreclosures, mortgage fraud and other things. If the investors want intelligent changes then they need to get behind the REIA groups who are talking with the law makers. The Realtors will represent the views of the agents. There is an OH statewide REIA organization. Check with them to see what is being done.

John Corey

PS. Some investors are all for more reforms. They know that if you get rid of the cowboy investors it will reduce the number of dumb deals and the bad reputation produced from cowboy investors. Savvy investors will find other ways to do deals. Having less competition is not a bad thing. If you cannot buy sub-2 then buying REOs is an option. Lots of variations. Yes, I have OH investments."
________________________________________________________________________
Denver, that is the problem with this whole thing like someone said earlier, the one lone cowboy crap. It is not a big deal from a legality standpoint YET, but it could be soon.

The big deal here is that the preception is the main thing we are fighting. Just like "theoretically" a lot of fancy footwork will work, but the reality is that if the legislators get a hold of stories like this they WILL legislate away this type of move. The reality of legal or not goes away under the witch hunt type of a deal, especially during an election year.

We may all intend on doing up and up business, but make a mistake or two here and there and under some instances it is not a big deal, but if it happens at the wrong time or in the wrong situation, then it blows up on us. What is that saying about road to hell paved with something................. just keep your head down and keep buying and selling houses, period.
_____________________________________________________________________
We all do our deals in the public glare when we deal with people who are under stress from a foreclosure.

You point out that the investor is not taking risk with their credit or spending money getting a loan. That sounds fishy or worse to many people. An investor not really committing to the deal and getting financing.

You do not know what the investor said or what they implied. Most will run ads or make statements that leave the impression that the investor is taking care of the mortgage, paying the payments, etc.

Creative RE deals sometimes are in a gray area. In some states you cannot speak to an owner who is in default or you have to follow a specific procedure. 1-2 states have a cooling off period where a seller can back out of a deal. Sellers under foreclosure are not always stable or rational in their thinking. Many are in denial or worse. It goes with the territory and it can be an issue for the investor if the case makes it to court.

Some investors are sharks. Some state attorneys general have pursued investors successfully when the investor was a subject-2 investor.

Look at the discussions here concerning being a bird dog. Most bird dog discussions revolve around illegal activity (being paid a fee is the deal closes). Every wonder why the regulators think investors are a bit too shady?

We do not know the full story. The press write to sells papers even if the articles have a bias. Having a view or an angle is not always a bad thing. We are all told to not believe everything we read yet most do.

Welcome to the real world of RE investing.

When the signs say there are sharks in the water maybe there are.

John Corey
_____________________________________________________________________
I have done Sub To deals and made money.
I told the people I would make the payment and I did, till I sold it
Sub To deals have a lot of liablity, in todays market, I am not doing them.
O-H-I-O has its own set of rules, with a "boyscout" for an AG, who is trying to make a name for itself.
I spent 3 months in Columbus last year.
I was checking out some REO's there.
dug into the propertys history. The scope of the fraud in these deals would have made the rings in Miami proud.
SUb to's are not illegal in and of itself
a DUE on SALE clause is a civil matter
The AG in OHIO is willing to use the civil court system when he can not file charges
that is one of the primary reasons I choose to go back to FL
Sunshine had lots to do with it too!
_________________________________________________________________________
YES! That is exactly what I said before all this about the AG of Ohio AND the licking county prosecutor (seems like Danns brother by way of his actions) . And he has succeeded making a name for himself (LOL) - http://dispatch.com/live/content/loc...F.html?sid=101
__________________________________________________________________________
Looks like a little trouble for the old AG
http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live...litics&sid=101

The FBI has been asked to investigate Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann, reportedly by a task force that is part of Dann's office.

Sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity told The Dispatch that the investigation's focus is Dann's dealings with gambling interests, not the ongoing sexual-harassment scandal in his office that has cost four people their jobs and triggered calls by Gov. Ted Strickland and other Democratic leaders for Dann's resignation or impeachment.

Michael Brooks, an FBI special agent who serves as spokesman, said, "We can neither confirm nor deny any investigation into the attorney general's office."

Dann spokesman Ted Hart initially said yesterday that he was unaware of an FBI probe. Hart, however, then talked to Dann, who told him that he knew the Ohio Organized Crime Investigations Commission had initiated a gambling investigation.

Dann, who is chairman of the commission, "recused himself from that investigation from the beginning," Hart said.

The commission's six other members are appointed by the governor. The group works closely with law-enforcement organizations to investigate specific criminal issues, including violent crime, burglary and, more recently, foreclosure scams.

Jeff Rossi, the panel's executive director, said he was unaware of a formal request to the FBI for an investigation. But he said one could have been generated by the commission or any member.

Dann, a Democrat elected in 2006, has refused to resign despite calls from top elected officials and essentially being disowned by the Ohio Democratic Party.
The state legislature is expected to act quickly this week on a measure giving Inspector General Thomas P. Charles broad authority to investigate mismanagement and the handling of the sexual-harassment complaints by Dann's office.


I have learned one thing
Crusaders tend to come back with arrows in them
you can rock the boat, just not too much
____________________________________________________________________________
http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnat...2/daily33.html
this is a good thing for the Ohio RE market

Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann, crippled by a sexual harassment scandal surrounding his office and an admitted affair with a staff member, resigned Wednesday.

Dann, 46, made the announcement at the Ohio Statehouse shortly before 5 p.m., joined by Gov. Ted Strickland, who had called for his resignation just over a week before.

"The only way to protect the priorities of the attorney general's office and the people of Ohio is to remove myself as attorney general," Dann said.
__________________________________________________________________________

Many Many Mire to come...

If We Didn't Build it, They Wouldn't Come: Citizen Journalism is Discovered - The Harsh Reality of the New World Media, By Robert Paisola

For Immediate Release
Copyright 2009 RobertPaisola.com All Rights Reserved.
Western Capital Multimedia
(PRNEWSWIRE.COM) Robert Paisola, Salt Lake City, Utah February 24, 2009

If We Didn't Build it, They Wouldn't Come: Citizen Journalism is Discovered - The Harsh Reality of the New World Media, By Robert Paisola

Over the past two years, the way in which American's receive their news has changed. No longer does the father come home, kick off his shoes, and read the day’s events in the local newspaper such as THE NEWARK ADVOCATE, A Gannett Publication, based in Newark, Ohio.

As a matter of fact, Forbes Magazine did a story late last year that received national attention that was entitled:

Timber! Newspaper Circulation Falls Again

Forbes Magazine states that "The slide in U.S. newspaper circulation is picking up speed"

"Daily circulation fell 3.57% from the same period last year for 530 U.S. newspapers reporting a Monday-through-Friday average for the six months ended March 31, 2008 according to data released by the Audit Bureau of Circulations. Among the 601 papers reporting Sunday circulation, circulation dropped 4.59%. Those numbers compare to declines of 2.6% for daily circulation and 3.5% for Sunday circulation during the six months ended Sept. 30.

Bucking the trend: Gannett's (nyse: GCI - news - people ) USA Today, the nation's largest-circulation daily, with average daily circulation of 2,284,219, up 0.27% and The Wall Street Journal, the second-largest daily, which said daily circulation inched up 0.35% to 2,069,463. The Journal was acquired in December 2008 by News Corp. (nyse: NWS - news - people ).

Among other top papers, the numbers looked far worse. The New York Times, the third-largest newspaper, which is facing stiffer competition from the Journal, saw daily circulation slide 3.85% to 1,077,256, while Sunday circulation tumbled 9.3% to 1,476,400.

The industry's most pressing problem isn't the state of print circulation, which has been in decline since the mid-1980s. Instead, it is figuring out how to generate more advertising revenue from both its shrinking but still lucrative print product and its growing online properties.

Still, nothing here should be seen as good news, says Forbes.

The biggest loser in average daily circulation among the 25 largest newspapers was A.H. Belo's (nyse: AHC - news - people ) Dallas Morning News, which absorbed a 10.6% drop to 368,313. Other large newspapers reporting sharp daily circulation declines included the New York Times Co. (nyse: NYT - news - people )-owned Boston Globe (down 8.3%), The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. (down 7.4%), the Star Tribune of Minneapolis (down 6.7%) and the Detroit Free Press (down 6.45%). Those with smaller-than-average losses included the New York Daily News (down 2.1%), the New York Post (down 3.1%), the Houston Chronicle (down 1.8%), the St. Petersburg Times (down 2.1%) and the San Diego Union-Tribune (down 2.6%).

So, what does this all mean to YOU, the American Public?

Well, there is only one question that we must ask ourselves. With the advent of the internet and the media statistical data clearly pointing to the fact that we now live in a GOOGLE controlled world, further demonstrated that more Americans are now turning to the web as the first line of contact on all issues, including the ones that we report on this site, such as The Harry Blausey Case in Newark, Ohio; The Rick Koerber Case in Salt Lake City, Utah and the National Olympic Swimming Hero Michael Phelps, who is being berated in North Carolina for his "alleged" incident involving the smoking of an illegal substance, and many others that you will read about on this site.

What is the difference in the way that news is now gathered and how can you create your own forum to simply state what you believe to a worldwide audience.

The days of the daily editorial meeting and "pitch sessions" to Newspaper and Television Editors and Producers are OVER. Why? Because, why they are in their meetings discussing how things SHOULD LOOK in America, there are those of us who are DOING. Do you see the difference?

The issue of Citizen Journalism has become so big that for the first time in history, Bloggers are now being credentialed as official media. They are able to cover International Issues such as The National Democratic and Republican Conventions. These Americans are now being granted full access to organizations such as THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL. Many case studies have proven that Americans want firsthand accounts on stories, detailed on site investigations that are not biased and real honest factual data.... and they would rather get it from their peers than from an "Executive Team" at a large news organization.

Most all of the major news organizations around the world now have entire units that deal with the acceptance and deliverance of CITIZEN JOURNALISM to the masses. CNN established a site located at www.ireport.com where individual citizens can partner with the "Worlds News Leader" to deliver content for broadcast to an international Audience. MSNBC has a site located at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6639760/ that gives the VIEWER the chance to now BECOME the story and to PARTICIPATE.

Recently we covered the Republican National Convention for CNN I REPORT. CNN had a "Kick Off" party at the OMNI hotel in Atlanta, Georgia in February where they passed out CNN Credentials and told the audience in attendance that "the power is now in your hands"

According to Turner Broadcasting, In 2008, CNN.com took a "bold step" with the launch of iReport.com, CNN’s user-generated news community. From its February launch through the end of 2008, the site registered more than 214,000 iReport.com contributors and received more than 188,000 photo and video submissions (Source: CNN/iReport Internal Database). According to Nielsen Online, iReport.com averaged 2.5 million unique visitors, 9.6 million page views and 10.1 million total minutes per month in 2008.

This gave many Americans a worldwide forum, and established the framework for what would soon become the norm. Reporters such as myself, Robert Paisola and my Company Western Capital Multimedia, immediately saw this as an opportunity to reach a worldwide audience, however we had to quickly make the decision of whether we would simply provide basic "camera phone reporting" or would we simply "Go for it" and dedicate ourselves to creating the best caliber content possible. We choose to invest over $100,000.00 in High Definition Video, Sound, Lighting, Editing and Software to give us the opportunity to submit instant and live news reports to CNN, but many other news organizations around the world. Has this investment paid off? Absolutely!

Because of this decision, we have now created an entire unit of our company that deals with international media issues. We have a press officer that deals with the media who are swarming to seek our assistance in covering stories. We have hired programmers, editors and writers. Why? Because it makes financial sense.

We deal with organizations around the world that are in desperate need of content. We follow the Requests posted by the sites of what kind of stories they want. CNN has an entire section on News that they are requesting coverage on.

At the end of the day, the investment we make in our broadcasting facilities pays off. Our company ends up with VERY VALUABLE NEWS FOOTAGE that we own outright. We create the content, the media around the world reviews the data, and in many cases, SUBSTANTIAL money can be made from the video, digital data, digital photographs and news stories that are provided. AND we still own the content. In case you are interested, our agent is Maxton Sparks in Australia, and they do the heavy lifting in dealing with the media around the world that want our product.

Do you NOW SEE My Friends HOW THE WORLD IS CHANGING!

Wikipedia states that "According to Jay Rosen, citizen journalists "the people formerly known as the audience," who "were on the receiving end of a media system that ran one way, in a broadcasting pattern, with high entry fees and a few firms competing to speak very loudly while the rest of the population listened in isolation from one another— and who today are not in a situation like that at all. ... The people formerly known as the audience are simply the public made realer, less fictional, more able, less predictable."

"Doing citizen journalism right means crafting a crew of correspondents who are typically excluded from or misrepresented by local television news: low-income women, minorities and youth -- the very demographic and lifestyle groups who have little access to the media and that advertisers don't want," says Robert Huesca, an associate professor of communication at Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas.

Public Journalism is now being explored via new media such as the use of mobile phones. Mobile phones have the potential to transform reporting and places the power of reporting in the hands of the public. Mobile telephony provides low-cost options for people to set up news operations. One small organization providing mobile news and exploring public journalism is Jasmine News in Sri Lanka.

In 2004, when the 9.1-magnitude underwater earthquake caused a huge tsunami in Banda Aceh Indonesia, news footage from many people who experienced the tsunami was widely broadcast.

Dan Gillmor, former technology columnist with the San Jose Mercury News, is one of the foremost proponents of citizen journalism, and founded a nonprofit, the Center for Citizen Media, to help promote it. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's French-language television network has also organized a weekly public affairs program called, "5 sur 5", which has been organizing and promoting citizen-based journalism since 2001. On the program, viewers submit questions on a wide variety of topics, and they, accompanied by staff journalists, get to interview experts to obtain answers to their questions.

Jay Rosen, a journalism professor at New York University, was one of public journalism's earliest proponents. From 1993 to 1997, he directed the Project on Public Life and the Press, funded by the Knight Foundation and housed at NYU. He also currently runs the PressThink weblog.

So, now ask yourself if YOU CAN SEE the power that you have inside you. Do you see the power of YOUR VOICE in America?

Do you notice the RESULTS of the cases that we cover? Do you notice how quickly our stories are broadcast around the globe? This is no accident. This is how it is. There is no turning back, and you can rest assured that our organization, with its strong international media alliances will continue to do what others have FAILED or REFUSED to do, and that is to provide you with REAL DATA, REAL RECORDED CONVERSATIONS, REAL VIDEO FEEDS and DIRECT ACCESS to the policy makers in America, as we cover cases of injustice such as the HARRY BLAUSEY case in Newark, Ohio. We do not need, nor seek the enforcement of Russ Zimmer, the reporter at the Gannet Owned Newark Advocate who covered the Harry Blausey trial; who when asked for comment on his 63 stories he had written on the topic, simply said "please refer to my stories, I have no comment"

Interesting. We will bring you more on that later.

This is our commitment to you... No matter what the cost.

Reporting from Salt Lake City, Utah
This is Robert Paisola for The Western Capital Multimedia Network
Copyright 2009 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Harry Blausey Case, The Story Continues, Newark Ohio, Licking County Ohio, Real Estate Foreclosure Specialist in Jail - By Robert Paisola

For Immediate Release
Copyright 2009 RobertPaisola.com All Rights Reserved.

(PRNEWSWIRE.COM) Robert Paisola, Los Angeles, California February 23, 2009

NEWARK, OHIO (AP) PRNEWSWIRE.COM

"I can't believe what has just happened" she said. "My father has just been convicted of something to do with his Real Estate Business, and they took him to jail" said Diane, a child of the accused. "We have no Idea what to do...Will you assist us?" "Absolutely" I replied, and at that moment I began to see what has happened to our society in the past 20 years that no logical person could have predicted.

Having known the Defendant Harry W. Blausey of Newark, Ohio for over 30 years, I began to reflect on the relationship that I had with this family and how they had been an instrumental part on the path that I would eventually take in life, as I too had lived in the small bedroom community outside of Columbus, Ohio called Newark, Ohio.

As I had graduated from Newark Senior High School and left Ohio to attend College at Brigham Young University, on a scholarship, I knew that there were differences in lifestyles and people, but I really believed that I could call Newark, Ohio my hometown, and be proud to say that as I spoke around the world, as I continue to do today. See RobertPaisola.com

The vigorous task at hand of reviewing the Blausey Case as it was outlined in the local papers and on the Internet was a maze in itself. One thing that I noticed was that there was very regular coverage by a news organization I was quite familiar with, The Newark Advocate, A Division of The organization I was quite familiar with,. The Newark Advocate, is A Division of The Gannet Corporation, and the Owner of USA Today, whom I also have worked with.

The relationships that I have shared with the Blausey family and the personal knowledge of the man that is now sitting in the State of Ohio Correctional Facility is the reason I decided that this was one task that my company, my employees and my foundations could not pass up. Partially because I knew the Defendant, but mostly because the preliminary research reports I was receiving by my staff was beginning to reach the absurd.

I, as a member of the National Media, and also a National Motivational Speaker and Trainer on Real Estate Matters Worldwide, take this case, a case that is to no longer be a simple State of Ohio Criminal Case, but one that would quickly be thrust into the national media spotlight.

Upon review of the preliminary data, I learned the following:

This was one of the first reports of the story in the media:

Real Estate Agent Accused In Foreclosure Scheme

NEWARK, Ohio — Investigators on Friday filed an indictment against a real estate agent accused of using the mortgage crisis to target homeowners as part of a foreclosure scheme.

Licking County Sheriff's deputies said they were not sure how many people were victims in Harry Blausey's real estate dealings, 10TV's Andy Hirsch reported.

According to deputies, Blausey would offer to help people facing foreclosure as long as they rented a property from him.

However, deputies said that Blausey never took over mortgage payments. Meanwhile some of his properties were also facing foreclosure -- something his renters never knew, Hirsch reported.

Blausey was taken into custody on Friday after a year-long investigation, Hirsch reported.

Licking County Sheriff's Captain Bruce Myers said most victims would never know about the scheme until a bank or a lender notified them to leave their home.

"You've got people that are already down on their luck somewhat," Myers said. "They're having some financial problems. Then you've got a guy who comes along, takes advantage of them and makes it worse than it already is."

Deputies called the scam "unusual," but said the current economy played a factor in the case.

"I think it has created an environment for something like this to flourish in," Myers said. "I hope it doesn't become a trend."

Blausey, who faces 10 counts of grand theft, 14 counts of securing writings by deception, five counts of felony theft and one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activities, was expected to appear in court next week, Hirsch reported.

This report appeared on the local CBS Television Affiliate, WBNS 10 Television in Columbus, Ohio.

"What does it mean in the State of Ohio to "secure writings by deception" I was asked, by my analysts at Western Capital, the company that I am currently the CEO and President. So we began to dig. Let’s learn a little more about the absurdity that wrongfully imprisoned a long standing member of the community, and personal friend of mine.

We were led on a month long maze that came to this conclusion: The only way we were going to get the true story was to fly into Ohio with our media investigative teams and begin to interview the supposed "Victims".

The results of our investigation are amazing. There is so much data to present to YOU, the American Public, that this will be a large task. The evidence will overwhelmingly show that Blausey was nothing more than a student of Carlton Sheets, Russ Whitney, Ron LeGrand, Trump University, and many other "International Gurus" who teach the business of real estate from a non-conventional aspect.

The local media and those closest to this case may now be seeing the error of their ways because of this preliminary outside third party investigation. You will see that the newspaper that has been covering this matter based in Newark, Ohio, The Newark Advocate, has now little to say about their reports. The Beat reporter Russell A. Zimmer, who was on this story from the beginning, was asked to sit down with us to do a recorded interview. He declined! The Civil Attorney on this case Carl McCoy was asked to do an interview with us, he accepted, and you will not believe what this man would say in 58 minutes. The Chief Trial Counsel for Blausey, Mark A. Serrott of Columbus, Ohio was contacted four times. The only time that he even responded was when we left a candid message on his voice mail about the trial and how it may effect his now pending request for a Judgeship in Ohio.

You will hear from many of the alleged victims of this matter, You will then be able to compare the statements that they made to the police at the time of the investigation against Harry Blausey, and their statements made to our team one year later.

This is perhaps one of the most serious stories that we have ever covered; because a man was following the teachings of some of the world’s most respected Real Estate Investment Trainers... and now sits in prison in Hocking County, Ohio under the Direction of Warden Ed Banks.

There are thousands of documents and recordings to present to you. We are assembling a team to completely reassemble this case from the beginning with HD Video, Interviews and Documents that will not only show that Harry Blausey is truly innocent, but that this is a case where the judicial system SIMPLY BROKE DOWN.

You will see attorney billing statements that represent investigators that were used in this man’s trial, however, you will also hear from Counsel that there were NO OUTSIDE INVESTIGATORS used, but that yes, the family was charged and paid for these services. You will see how our request to access the trial file was responded to by Lead Counsel, Mark A. Serrott. If you or a loved one were involved in this case please send us your stories to investigations@harryblausey.com and your confidentiality is assured.

Stay tuned to this site for additional information on an assault that took place against Mr. Blausey at the Hocking County Correctional Facility in Ohio. We will present the reports and are attempting to gain a statement from Warden Ed Banks, or the Public Relations Office for the Ohio Department of Corrections in Columbus, Ohio

All media inquiries, or if your publication or media outlet would like additional data on this case, should be made in written form to media.relations@robertpaisolainnocenceproject.com or by calling 801-671-7843 or 1-877-517-9555 in the United States Toll Free

HARRY BLAUSEY CASE DOCKET OUTLINED : From the Licking County Website

2008 CR 00155 STATE OF OHIO vs. BLAUSEY, HARRY W TMM File Date 03/21/2008 Case Status CLOSED Case Status Date 03/21/2008 Case Disposition CONVICTION AND CONVEY Case Disposition Date 11/21/2008

Party Information Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone FROST, EARL ATTORNEY FROST, EARL BLAUSEY, HARRY W DEFENDANT MILLER, KELLY, P.O. ROSAN, KRISTIN E 6142285600 SERROTT, MARK A 6142213311 MILLER, KELLY PROBATION OFFICER

Case Schedule Date Start Time Event Type Result 11/21/2008 08:15 AM SENTENCING 11/03/2008 09:00 AM CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL 10/31/2008 09:00 AM CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL 10/29/2008 09:00 AM CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL 10/28/2008 09:00 AM JURY TRIAL 05/15/2008 08:15 AM ORAL HEARING 04/23/2008 08:30 AM PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Party Charge(s) Case Party BLAUSEY, HARRY W Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 1 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 2 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 3 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 4 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 5 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT DISMISSED 11/04/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 6 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 DISMISSED 11/04/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 7 2913.02 THEFT-2913.02 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 8 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 9 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 10 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 11 2913.02 THEFT-2913.02 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 12 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 13 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 14 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 15 2913.02 THEFT-2913.02 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 16 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 17 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 18 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 19 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 20 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 21 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 22 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 23 2913.02 THEFT-2913.02 DISMISSED 01/14/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 24 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 25 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 26 2913.02GT GRAND THEFT-2913.02GT CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 27 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 28 2913.02 THEFT-2913.02 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 29 2913.43 SEC WRIT BY DEC-2913.43 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008 Count Code Description Disposition Disposition Date 30 2923.32 ENGAGING PAT. OR CORR. ACT-2923.32 CONVICTION & CONVEY 11/21/2008

Financial Entries Receipt # Date Received From Amount Paid 109556 10/20/2008 HARRY BLAUSEY 100.00 Payment CHECK 100.00 Fee COST 100.00

Docket Entries Date Text 02/20/2009 MOTION FOR JUDICIAL RELEASE FILED 02/10/2009 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER STATES RESPONSE TO DEFT FILED (ORIGINAL COPY) 02/04/2009 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT 02/02/2009 CERTIFIED COPY OF DOCKET PAGE TOGETHER WITH ALL ORGINIAL PAPERS FROM CP COURT FILED TRANSMITTED TO 08 CA 156 (THE RECORD) 01/26/2009 JUDGMENT ENTRY-THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT ON MOTION FOR PREPARATION OF COMPLETE TRANSCRIPTS AND PROCEEDINGS AT STATE'S EXPENSE AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.THE COURT DENIES THE DEFT'S MOTION. 01/15/2009 SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTION FOR STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL & PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AT STATE EXPENSE FILED. 12/29/2008 STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL AND PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AT STATE EXPENSE FILED. 12/29/2008 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY FILED 12/22/2008 DOCKETING STATEMENT FILED. COPY TRANSMITTED TO 08CA156 12/22/2008 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE FILED. COPY TRANSMITTED TO 08CA156 12/22/2008 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FILED 12/22/2008 MOTION FOR PREPARATION OF COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS AT STATE EXPENSE FILED 12/19/2008 SHERIFF'S RETURN FOR WARRANT TO CONVEY TO CRC ON 11/25/08 12/18/2008 NOTICE TO SENTENCING COURT OF OFFENDER'S RECOMMENDED PLACEMENT INTO THE INTENSIVE PROGRAM PRISON. OFFENDER'S PLACEMENT IN THAT PROGRAM IS DISAPPROVED. 12/12/2008 STATE'S MOTION PETITIONING COURT TO DENY DEFT'S PLACEMENT INTO INTENSIVE PROGRAM PRISON FILED 11/21/2008 FINGERPRINT CARD MAILED TO BCI 11/21/2008 CASE DISPOSITION: CONVICTION AND CONVEY 11/21/2008 REPARATIONS 11/21/2008 WARRANT TO CONVEY ISSUED TO LICKING CO. SHERIFF. 11/21/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; COURT SENTENCES THE DEFT TO 4 1/2 YEARS IN PRISON. CREDIT FOR 23 DAYS. DEFT IS ORDERED TO PAY COURT COSTS, RESTITUTION. 11/21/2008 DUE COUNTY FOR COURT REPORTER. 11/20/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY-COURT GRANTS PERMISSION TO RUSS ZIMMER OF THE ADVOCATE TO RECORD THE HEARING ON NOV 21, 2008 AT 8:15 A.M. 11/20/2008 REQUEST OF MEDIA TO RECORD COURT PROCEEDINGS FILED 11/17/2008 LETTER FROM PURSELL THOMPSON TO TMM 11/05/2008 SENTENCING HEARING: NOV 21, 2008 AT 8:15 A.M. 11/05/2008 WITNESS FEES 11/05/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: SENTENCING Date: 11/21/2008 Time: 8:15 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 11/04/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY-THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT ON OCT 28, 29, 30, 31, AND NOV 3, 2008 FOR A JURY TRIAL. THE COURT DISMISSES COUNT 5, 6, AND 23. THE JURY RENDERED A VERDICT OF GUILTY ON 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, AND 29 AND NOT GUILTY ON COUNT 30. SENTENCING IN THIS CASE IS DEFERRED PENDING A PSI REPORT. BOND IS REVOKED AND THE DEFT IS REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF LCJC. THIS MATTER SHALL COME ON FOR SENTENCING HEARING AFTER A PSI REPORT. 11/04/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY-RECORD RETENTION FILED 11/04/2008 DUE COUNTY FOR COURT REPORTER. 11/03/2008 COSTS FOR JURY, $25.00 PER DAY EACH JUROR == $25.00 X 14= $350.00 11/03/2008 VERDICT 30-THE DEFT WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 29-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 29-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 28-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 28-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 27-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 27-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 26- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 26- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 25- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 25- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 24-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 24-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 22-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 22-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 21- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 20-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 20-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 19-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 19-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 18-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 18-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 17-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 17-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 16-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 16-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 15-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 15-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 14-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 14-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 13-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 13- THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 12-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 12-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 11-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 11-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 10-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 10-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 9-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 9-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 8-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 8-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDING 7-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF FELONY THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 7-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDING 4-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS 11/03/2008 VERDICT 4-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECUING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 3-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 3-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 2-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 2-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SECURING WRITINGS BY DECEPTION, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT: SPECIAL FINDINGS 1- THE DEFT IS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY WAS $5,0000 OR MORE, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 VERDICT 1-THE DEFT WAS FOUND GUILTY OF GRAND THEFT, SIGNED BY 12 JURORS. 11/03/2008 JURY INSTRUCTIONS FILED. 10/31/2008 COSTS FOR JURY, $25.00 PER DAY EACH JUROR == $25.00 X 14= $350.00 10/31/2008 STIPULATION FILED BY THE STATE 10/31/2008 DEFT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS FILED. 10/31/2008 STIPULATION FILED BY THE STATE 10/30/2008 COSTS FOR JURY, $25.00 PER DAY EACH JUROR == $25.00 X 14= $350.00 10/30/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28-NOV 3, 2008 AT 8:45 AM 10/29/2008 COSTS FOR JURY, $25.00 PER DAY EACH JUROR == $25.00 X 14= $350.00 10/29/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR NATHAN AND AMANDA WHIGHTSEL NO SERVICE, NEW TENANTS 10/29/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR VICKY WILSON-NO SERVICE-MOVED OUT 2 WEEKS AGO 10/29/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR BILL YOUNG-PERSONALLY SERVED 10/28/2008 COSTS FOR JURY, $25.00 PER DAY EACH JUROR == $25.00 X 61= $1525.00 10/28/2008 DUE CLERK FOR CALLING JURY 10/28/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR JOSHUA LEACH (PS) AND LCSO (PS) 10/28/2008 SHERIFF'S RETURN ON NOTICE TO SERVE SERVED ON 10-27-08 10/27/2008 STATE'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS FILED 10/27/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED FOR SN SERVICING COPR, RECVD ON 10-20-08. 10/24/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR TIMOTHY NETHERS (PS), PHIL FRYE (PS), DALE AND ROBIN BAKER (NS-BAD ADDRESS) 10/24/2008 STIPLUATION FILED 10/24/2008 STIPLUATION FILED 10/24/2008 STIPULATION FILED 10/24/2008 STIPULATION FILED 10/23/2008 DEFT'S SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR 10-28-08 TO 11-5-08 AT 9:00 A.M. 10/23/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/23/2008 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FILED BY MARK SERROTT (COUNSEL) AND KRISTIN ROSAN (CO-COUNSEL) 10/23/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR JAMES HAYES (RS), HEATHER SHORT (NS-TWO ATTEMPTS, NO RESPONSE FROM TAGS ON DOOR), JUDITH GREEN (RS), BELLIE HATFIELD (PS), KEITH AND CYNTHIA BOLEY (NS-TWO ATTEMPTS, NO RESPONSE FROM TAGS ON DOOR), TAMMY BURKS (NS-DOES NOT LIVE HERE ANYMORE-SHE IS A LOCAL REAL ESTATE AGENT-NO OTHER INFO) 10/22/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR REINER, LORBER AND ARNOVITZ (PS) 10/21/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED FOR HOME LOAN SERVICES. RECVD ON 10-17-08. 10/20/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR WILSHIRE CREDIT CORP (PS); CHASE BANK (PS); MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER (PS); REINER, LORBER, & ARNOVITZ(PS); DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE (PS); CITI RESIDENTIAL LENDING (PS); OCEAN BANK (PS) 10/20/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/20/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED FOR WELLS FARGO. RECVD ON 10-16-08. 10/17/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/17/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/16/2008 ELECTRONIC MONITORING FEE Receipt: 109556 Date: 10/20/2008 10/16/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; THIS MATTER CAME FOR A HEARING ON THE MOTION TO REVOKE BOND FILED BY THE STATE. COURT MODIFIES THE DEFT'S BOND AND PLACES HIM ON HOUSE ARREST. SEE ENTRY. 10/15/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/15/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED OCT 28, 2008-NOV 5, 2008 AT 9:00 AM 10/15/2008 DEFT'S MOTION TO CLOSE HEARING AND DEFT'S MEMORANDUM CONTA PROSECUTOR'S MOTION TO REVOKE BOND FILED 10/15/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: BOND HEARING Date: 10/17/2008 Time: 1:30 pm Judge: KLEIN, MATTIE Location: COURTROOM #4 (GROUND FLOOR) Result: CANCELLED 10/14/2008 Issue Date: 10/14/2008 Service: INFORMATION Method: CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $ 0.00 SAXTON MORTGAGE CO 4708 MERCANTILE DR N FORT WORTH, TX 76137 Tracking No: C000054046 HOME LOAN SERVICES PO BOX 660598 DALLAS, TX 75266 Tracking No: C000054047 SN SERVICING CORP C/O JOANIE YORKS 323 5TH ST EUREKA, CA 95501 Tracking No: C000054048 WELLS FARGO C/O HOLLY STANSBURY 8480 STAGECOACH DR FREDERICK, MD 21701 Tracking No: C000054049 REINER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ 2450 EDISON BLVD TWINSBURG, OH 44087 Tracking No: C000054050 WILSHIRE CREDIT CORP 50 W BROAD ST, STE 1800 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Tracking No: C000054051 MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER 250 CIVIC CENTER DR, STE 500 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Tracking No: C000054052 CITI RESIDENTIAL LENDING C/O CT-CORP SYSTEM 1300 E 9TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44144 Tracking No: C000054053 OCEAN BANK C/O LERNER, SAMSON, ROTHFUSS 120 E 4TH ST CINCINNATI, OH 45202 Tracking No: C000054054 DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE CO 1300 E 9TH ST CLEVELAND, OH 44144 Tracking No: C000054055 CHASE BANK 15 N 3RD ST NEWARK, OH 43055 Tracking No: C000054056 10/14/2008 SERVICE ISSUED WITH COPY OF 10/14/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 10/10/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR BIRDIE REY (NS-MOVED OUT 2 YEARS AGO) AND ALICE HARLOW (PS) 10/09/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 10/09/2008 MOTION TO REVOKE BOND FILED. 10/07/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 09/15/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR JOYCE BROKAW (RS) AND ROBERT BROKAW (RS) 09/09/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 09/09/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 09/09/2008 KNOX COUNTY-SHERIFF'S RETURN ON SUBPOENA FILED FOR TERRI CUNNINGHAM (RS). 08/22/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 08/22/2008 KNOX COUNTY-SHERIFF'S RETURN ON SUBPOENA FILED FOR TERRI CUNNINGHAM BY PS. 08/20/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR 10-28-08 AT 8:45 AM 08/19/2008 PRE-PAID WITNESS FEES FOR TERRI CUNNINGHAM 08/19/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 08/07/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 08/07/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 07/30/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 07/30/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 07/21/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 07/11/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR JOHN SCHOUSTER (RS), SANDARA SCHOUSTER (PS), ALICE HARLOW (NS-4 ATTEMPTS MADE), BRIAN HARLOW (NS-4 ATTEMPTS MADE), BIRDIE REY (NS-5 ATTEMPTS MADE), AND CARIA ROBINETTE (RS) 07/08/2008 MUSKINGUM COUNTY-SHERIFF'S RETURN ON SUBPOENA FILED FOR JESSICA MITCHELL (RS) AND SAMUEL MITCHELL PS. 07/07/2008 MUSKINGUM CO SUBPOENA RETURNED SAMUEL MITCHELL-PS 06/30/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 06/25/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 06/25/2008 NOTICE TO SERVE CRC FILED 06/24/2008 COURT ORDER OF SUBPOENA FILED 06/24/2008 REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA FILED 06/23/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR KREG LIESER(RS);JOSHUA LEACH(NO SERVICE-IN PRISON) 06/09/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. HSBC BANK USA. JUNE 2, 2008. 06/09/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. SN SERVICING CORP. JUNE 2, 2008. 06/06/2008 DISCOVERY RECORD, NOTICE OF INTENT, BILL OF PARTICULARS, STATE'S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED. 06/06/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. SAXTON MORTGAGE SERVICE. JUNE 2, 2008. 06/06/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. OCEAN BANK. JUNE 2, 2008. 06/06/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. CITY RESIDENTIAL LIV JUN 2, 2008. 06/05/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. HOME LOAN SERVICES REC'D 6/2/08. 06/05/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. DOVENMUCHLE MORTGAGE REC'D 5/31/08. 06/05/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. REIMER, LORBER AND ARNOVITZ REC'D ON 6/2/08. 06/05/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. REINER, LORBER, AND ARNOVITZ REC'D ON 6/2/08. 06/05/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. WELLS FARGO REC'D ON 6/2/08. 06/04/2008 DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PROSECUTION'S RECIPROCAL DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED. 06/04/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FILED. CHASE BANK 6/2/08 06/03/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM WILSHIRE CREDIT CORP. MAY 31, 2008 FILED. 06/03/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER MAY 30, 2008 FILED. 06/03/2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER MAY 30, 2008 FILED. 05/29/2008 Issue Date: 05/29/2008 Service: INFORMATION Method: CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $ 0.00 CITY RESIDENTIAL LIVING 10801 E 6TH ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Tracking No: C000050099 WILSHIRE CREDIT CORP 14523 SW MILLIKAN WAY STE 200 BEVERTON, OR 97005 Tracking No: C000050100 HSBC BANK USA PO BOX 2013 BUFFALO, NY 14240 Tracking No: C000050101 MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER 250 CIVIC CENTER DR, STE 500 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Tracking No: C000050102 MAGUIRE & SCHNEIDER 250 CIVIC CENTER DR STE 500 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Tracking No: C000050103 OCEAN BANK 1 HOME LOAN PLAZA WARWICK, RI 02886 Tracking No: C000050104 REIMER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ 2450 EDDISON BLVD TWINSBURG, OH 44087 Tracking No: C000050105 REINER, LORBER & ARNOVITZ 2450 EDISON BLVD TWINSBURG, OH 44087 Tracking No: C000050106 DOVENMUCHLE MORTGAGE 1 CORPORATE CENTER DR STE 360 LAKE ZURICH, IL 60047 Tracking No: C000050107 SN SERVICING CORP 323 5TH ST EUREKA, CA 95501 Tracking No: C000050108 SAXTON MORTGAGE SERVICE 4708 MERCHANTILE DR N FORT WORTH, TX 76137 Tracking No: C000050109 HOME LOAN SERVICES 150 ALLEGHENY CENTER MALL LOCATOR 24-050 PITTSBURG, PA 15212 Tracking No: C000050110 CHASE BANK 15 N 3RD ST NEWARK, OH 43055 Tracking No: C000050111 WELLS FARGO 8480 STAGECOACH CIRCLE FREDERICK, MD 21701 Tracking No: C000050112 05/29/2008 SERVICE ISSUED WITH COPY OF SUBPOENAS SENT BY CERT. MAIL 05/28/2008 CERT. MAIL SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCT 28-NOV 3, 2008 AT 8:45 A.M. 05/27/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 05/23/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR MISTY LENZ (PS). 05/23/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR BAMBI BRUCK (PS). 05/23/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR DET. MARK PHILLIPS (RS). 05/22/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 05/22/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR CRAIG ORRMAN -S AND MARGARET OTTMAN -PS 05/19/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; THE DEFT'S BOND IS MODIFIED TO REQUIRE THAT HE NOTIFY THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE WHEN ANY OF THE PROPERTIES CONTAINED IN THE INDICTMENT, AND UNDER HIS CONTROL, ARE TO BE ENCUMBERED OR TRANSFERRED. 05/15/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; THIS MATTER CAME FOR A HEARING ON THE MOTION FILED BY THE STATE. COURT ASKED DEFT'S COUNSEL TO PREPARE AN ENTRY OUTLINING THE SAME AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COURT FOR APPROVAL. ON THE MOTION TO AMEND BOND, THE STATE INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD PREPARE AN ENTRY OUTLINING AN AGREEMENT OF BOTH PARTIES AND SUBMIT THE SAME TO THE COURT. 05/15/2008 DUE COUNTY FOR COURT REPORTER. 05/14/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED RUSSELL THOMPSON (PS); BARBARA YOCKMAN (RS); KENNETH YOCKMAN (PS). 05/14/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCTOBER 28, 2008 THRU NOVEMBER 3, 2008 @ 8:45 A.M. 05/13/2008 DEFT'S MEMORANDUM CONTRA PROSECUTORS MOTION TO AMEND BOND CONDITIONS FILED. 05/13/2008 MOTION FOR AN ORDER PROHIBITING THE PARTIES OR POLICE PERSONNEL FROM DISCUSSING THE CASE WITH THE MEDIA FILED. 05/12/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 05/12/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 05/12/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR KENNETH GEORGE (PS); LINDA GEORGE (RS). 05/12/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR LEANNA BUENA (RS); PHILBERT BUENA (PS); TERRIE E. CUNNINGHAM (PS). 05/09/2008 SUBPOENA RETURNED FOR DET. JAY COOK (PS); PTL. RAY HOPKINS (RS); MICHAEL APPLEMAN (RS); MELINDA APPLEMAN (PS). 05/05/2008 SUBPOENA FOR WITNESS FILED FOR OCTOBER 28, 2008 @ 8:45 A.M. 05/02/2008 MOTION TO AMEND BOND FILED. 05/01/2008 COURT ORDER OF HEARING. ORAL HEARING ON MOTION TO AMEND BOND. MAY 15, 2008 @ 8:15 A.M. 05/01/2008 COURT ORDER OF HEARING. JURY TRIAL (ALLOW 5 DAYS). OCTOBER 28, 2008. 05/01/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 05/01/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: ORAL HEARING Date: 05/15/2008 Time: 8:15 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 05/01/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; THE TRIAL IS CONTINUED TO OCT 28, 2008 AT 9:00 A.M. 05/01/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL Date: 11/03/2008 Time: 9:00 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 05/01/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL Date: 10/31/2008 Time: 9:00 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 05/01/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: CONTINUATION OF JURY TRIAL Date: 10/29/2008 Time: 9:00 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 05/01/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: JURY TRIAL Date: 10/28/2008 Time: 9:00 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 04/29/2008 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL SET FOR JULY 8, 2008, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT FILED. 04/29/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE THE COURT RE: A MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE. COURT RESERVES RULING. SEE ENTRY. 04/29/2008 DEFT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE FILED. 04/23/2008 PRETRIAL ENTRY FILED. 04/15/2008 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY FILED. 04/09/2008 DISCOVERY RECORD, NOTICE OF INTENT, BILL OF PARTICULARS, STATE'S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED 04/02/2008 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED. 03/27/2008 COURT ORDER OF HEARING: JURY TRIAL ON 7-8-08 AT 9:00 AM 03/27/2008 COURT ORDER OF HEARING: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON 4-23-08 AT 8:30 AM 03/27/2008 SHERIFF'S RETURN ON WARRANT ISSUED SERVED3-21-08 03/27/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: JURY TRIAL Date: 07/08/2008 Time: 9:00 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM Result: CONTINUED 03/27/2008 HEARING SCHEDULED Event: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Date: 04/23/2008 Time: 8:30 am Judge: MARCELAIN, THOMAS M Location: EAST COURTROOM 03/25/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY-THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COURT ON 3-24-08 FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE, DEFT PLED NOT GUILTY. BOND IS SET AT $50,000 C/S WITH CONDITIONS (SEE ENTRY) 03/24/2008 JUDGMENT ENTRY; COUNT THIRTY SHALL READ AS A FELONY OF THE SECOND DEGREE NOT OF THE FIRST DEGREE. 03/24/2008 STATE'S MOTION TO AMEND INDICTMENT FILED. 03/24/2008 BOND SHEET SIGNED BY DEFT 03/24/2008 WARRANT TO DISCHARGE PRISONER FAXED TO LCJC AT 12:15 PM 03/24/2008 BOND POSTED BY CHARLES J. MILLER BONDING COMPANY FOR $50,000 C/S 03/21/2008 WARRANT & INDICTMENT ISSUED TO LICKING CO. SHERIFF FOR BOND HEARING ON 3-24-08 AT 8:30 AT LCJC. 03/21/2008 INDICTMENT FILED FOR GRAND THEFT (10 CTS-F4), SECURING WRITINGS BY DECPETION (14 CTS-F4), THEFT (5 CTS-F5), AND ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF CORRUPT ACTIVITY (F2).